25 Jun 2026
India

Ram Mandir theft case: No accused is a trustee, all 8 outsourced workers

By GS TEAM
25 Jun 20266 mins read
TukuTouch Logo
Ayodhya Ram Temple donation embezzlement scandal intensifies with an FIR against eight outsourced staff, not trustees. A SIT investigation uncovered alleged systematic siphoning of multi-crore offerings by low-salaried employees, now possessing vast disproportionate assets. Charges include criminal breach of trust, theft, and conspiracy, sparking demands for a deeper, court-monitored probe.

Summarized by AI; it may make mistakes. Check important info

Ram Mandir theft case: No accused is a trustee, all 8 outsourced workers
Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft

The controversy surrounding the alleged multi-crore donation embezzlement at the Ram Janmabhoomi Temple in Ayodhya has intensified following an investigation by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) appointed by the Uttar Pradesh government. A formal First Information Report (FIR) has been registered against eight individuals on charges including criminal breach of trust, theft, cheating, and criminal conspiracy.

Connection with the Temple Trust

None of the principal accused are official trustees of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. Instead, they were part of a 50-member outsourced counting and administrative team tasked with handling, weighing, and recording the vast daily cash, gold, and silver offerings brought from the temple's 35-plus donation boxes to a secure basement counting room.

A whistleblower (the former chief accounts officer of the trust, Mahipal Singh) alleged that these individuals ran a systematic scheme where voucher entries were recorded lower than the actual cash counted, allowing them to siphon off the difference.

Background of the Accused

The sudden and dramatic shift in the lifestyles and asset portfolios of these low-salaried employees (who legally earned between ₹14,000 and ₹20,000 per month) is what primarily blew the lid off the operation.

  1. Ramashankar Yadav (alias Tinnu Yadav)

Background: Widely cited as a central figure in the investigation, he reportedly worked as an auto-rickshaw driver in Ayodhya before securing his role in the temple's cash-counting operations.

Investigated Wealth: Authorities are probing assets estimated to be worth nearly ₹50 crore, which allegedly include a 70-room hostel near the Ayodhya airport, stakes in three local restaurants, a luxury Fortuner SUV, and a house in Lucknow.

  1. Anukalp Mishra

Background: Employed as part of the cash-handling and verification staff.

Investigated Wealth: Under investigation for amassing property vastly disproportionate to his formal salary, including a lavish ₹65-lakh residence in Kaushalpuri (Ayodhya) and a farmhouse built in his ancestral village.

His high spending on massive religious and family functions also drew the attention of investigators.

  1. Lavkush Mishra

Background: Prior to working within the temple administration's cash-counting wing, he reportedly worked as a local car mechanic.

Investigated Wealth: He became a primary target of the initial police raids, during which Ayodhya Police recovered between ₹10 lakh and ₹12 lakh in hard cash directly from his residence in the Rudauli area of Ayodhya.

  1. Manish Yadav

Background: He is the nephew of Ramashankar "Tinnu" Yadav and worked directly alongside him in the high-security cash-counting room.

Investigated Wealth: Allegedly caught in possession of ₹36 lakh in cash during the preliminary phases of the crackdown.

  1. Subhash Srivastava

Background: Unlike the outsourced counting staff, Srivastava is a veteran Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) sanghachalak (local chief) for the Acharya Nagar area in Ayodhya.

He was brought into the periphery of fund management and bookkeeping operations due to his organizational links.

6, 7, & 8. Avinash Shukla, Karunesh Pandey, and Rama Shankar Mishra

Background: These individuals functioned as clerks, hand-picked depositors, or counting assistants inside the Pilgrim Facilitation Centre's restricted counting room.

They face charges for their alleged roles in the criminal conspiracy, deliberately manipulating voucher entries, and masking the physical trails of the incoming donations.

Current Legal Status: The case is registered under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Sections 306 (theft by clerk/servant), 316 (criminal breach of trust), and 61 (criminal conspiracy).

While the Trust initially claimed routine audits caught no discrepancies, the scale of public allegations and the SIT's initial findings forced the registration of the FIR.

The political opposition has demanded a deeper, court-monitored investigation, alleging that smaller workers are being targeted to shield senior figures.

A formal First Information Report (FIR) has been registered against eight individuals on charges including criminal breach of trust, theft, cheating, and criminal conspiracy.Connection with the Temple TrustNone of the principal accused are official trustees of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. Instead, they were part of a 50-member outsourced counting and administrative team tasked with handling, weighing, and recording the vast daily cash, gold, and silver offerings brought from the temple's 35-plus donation boxes to a secure basement counting room.A whistleblower (the former chief accounts officer of the trust, Mahipal Singh) alleged that these individuals ran a systematic scheme where voucher entries were recorded lower than the actual cash counted, allowing them to siphon off the difference.Background of the AccusedThe sudden and dramatic shift in the lifestyles and asset portfolios of these low-salaried employees (who legally earned between ₹14,000 and ₹20,000 per month) is what primarily blew the lid off the operation.1. Ramashankar Yadav (alias Tinnu Yadav)Background: Widely cited as a central figure in the investigation, he reportedly worked as an auto-rickshaw driver in Ayodhya before securing his role in the temple's cash-counting operations.Investigated Wealth: Authorities are probing assets estimated to be worth nearly ₹50 crore, which allegedly include a 70-room hostel near the Ayodhya airport, stakes in three local restaurants, a luxury Fortuner SUV, and a house in Lucknow.2. Anukalp MishraBackground: Employed as part of the cash-handling and verification staff.Investigated Wealth: Under investigation for amassing property vastly disproportionate to his formal salary, including a lavish ₹65-lakh residence in Kaushalpuri (Ayodhya) and a farmhouse built in his ancestral village.His high spending on massive religious and family functions also drew the attention of investigators.3. Lavkush MishraBackground: Prior to working within the temple administration's cash-counting wing, he reportedly worked as a local car mechanic.Investigated Wealth: He became a primary target of the initial police raids, during which Ayodhya Police recovered between ₹10 lakh and ₹12 lakh in hard cash directly from his residence in the Rudauli area of Ayodhya.4. Manish YadavBackground: He is the nephew of Ramashankar "Tinnu" Yadav and worked directly alongside him in the high-security cash-counting room.Investigated Wealth: Allegedly caught in possession of ₹36 lakh in cash during the preliminary phases of the crackdown.5. Subhash SrivastavaBackground: Unlike the outsourced counting staff, Srivastava is a veteran Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) sanghachalak (local chief) for the Acharya Nagar area in Ayodhya.He was brought into the periphery of fund management and bookkeeping operations due to his organizational links.6, 7, & 8. Avinash Shukla, Karunesh Pandey, and Rama Shankar MishraBackground: These individuals functioned as clerks, hand-picked depositors, or counting assistants inside the Pilgrim Facilitation Centre's restricted counting room.They face charges for their alleged roles in the criminal conspiracy, deliberately manipulating voucher entries, and masking the physical trails of the incoming donations.Current Legal Status: The case is registered under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Sections 306 (theft by clerk/servant), 316 (criminal breach of trust), and 61 (criminal conspiracy).While the Trust initially claimed routine audits caught no discrepancies, the scale of public allegations and the SIT's initial findings forced the registration of the FIR.The political opposition has demanded a deeper, court-monitored investigation, alleging that smaller workers are being targeted to shield senior figures.