Image: IANS

The upcoming film ‘Maharaj’, starring Junaid Khan, actor Aamir Khan’s son in the lead role, has landed into controversy, with many claiming the film is anti-Hindu.

The Gujarat high court has put a halt on the Netflix release of the movie. Originally slated for release on June 14, the film has faced opposition from followers of the Vaishnavite Pushtimargi sect.

In the ongoing controversy, the petitioners argue that the film’s depiction of historical events could incite religious tensions and misinform the public about their beliefs.

These followers, devotees of Lord Krishna, argue that the film misrepresents their religious practices and disrespects their beliefs. This prompted a petition to the Gujarat High Court, which ordered the temporary stay on the film’s release.

Legal experts have weighed in on the case, noting the complexities involved in adjudicating matters related to artistic freedom and religious sentiments.

“The court must carefully consider the historical context and the filmmakers’ intent while also ensuring that the portrayal does not lead to unrest or communal disharmony,” said lawyer and constitutional expert, Rajeev Dhavan.

Interestingly, when Narendra Modi was chief minister of Gujarat, he praised Karsandas Mulji in a blog post, acknowledging his contributions to social reform and the bravery he exhibited during the Maharaj Libel Case.

PM Modi highlighted Mulji’s dedication to truth and justice, emphasising how his legacy continues to inspire his efforts towards transparency and accountability in public life.

Story behind 'Maharaj'

Mulji published his accusations in his Gujarati weekly newspaper, ‘Satya Prakash’. Jadunathji Maharaj, in response, filed a libel suit against Mulji and the newspaper's publisher, Nanabhai Rustomji Ranina.

The trial, in the Supreme Court of Bombay, garnered widespread public and media attention. Starting on Jan 25, 1862, and concluding on Mar 4, 1862, the case saw extensive testimonies from various individuals, including missionaries and doctors who corroborated Mulji’s allegations.

The judgement, delivered on Apr 22, 1862, was a landmark victory for Mulji. The court recognised his role as a journalist in exposing wrongdoing and promoting moral integrity in society. Mulji was ordered to be compensated ₹11,500 for his legal costs, which amounted to ₹13,000.

(This story was taken from a syndicated feed, and edited only for style by Gujarat Samachar Digital staff)