Ahmedabad

AMC's 'PPP' Game: Municipal Land And Public Funds Used To hand Over Crores In Flyover Space To Private Agencies

By GS Team
1 Aug 20262 mins read
TukuTouch Logo
Ahmedabad's PPP model faces scrutiny as AMC allegedly leases prime flyover properties at throwaway prices after building sports facilities with public funds. Critics highlight lost revenue, citing Ghodasar flyover's 5-year, ₹4.11 lakh lease versus multi-crore pay-and-parking potential. Concerns grow over transparency and financial losses, sparking calls for an inquiry into municipal decisions favoring private profit over public treasury.

Summarized by AI; it may make mistakes. Check important info

AMC's 'PPP' Game: Municipal Land And Public Funds Used To hand Over Crores In Flyover Space To Private Agencies
AI image

A fresh controversy has erupted over the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model adopted by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), with serious allegations emerging that prime municipal property under city flyovers is being handed over to private operators at throwaway prices. Critics and municipal insiders point out a bizarre arrangement: the civic body uses tax dollars to build multi-lakh-rupee sports facilities under flyovers, only to lease them out to private agencies for negligible annual fees, denying the AMC treasury substantial revenue from straightforward pay-and-parking options.

The practice has raised eyebrows within civic circles, where officials privately mock the current setup as a one-sided PPP model where the municipality bears all the capital risks and infrastructure costs while private entities collect the profits.

Ghodasar Flyover Deal Raises Transparency Concerns

The latest point of contention centers on the space underneath the Ghodasar flyover. After spending lakhs of public funds to convert the vacant area into a sports activity zone, the AMC issued a tender for its five-year operation and management.

The contract was awarded to Soya Ashish Rameshbhai, who quoted an annual fee of just ₹4.11 lakh—a proposal swiftly cleared by the AMC's Vyayamsala (Physical Education) Department. Urban governance experts and opposition voices have questioned the decision, arguing that operational contracts for newly developed public facilities are standardly capped at one to three years to reassess commercial value, whereas granting an immediate five-year lease locks in low returns for the civic body.

Pay-And-Parking Generates Crores Without Municipal Outlay

The controversy is heightened by the fact that setting up basic pay-and-parking lots under city flyovers yields steady, high returns for the AMC with zero infrastructure investment, while simultaneously relieving traffic congestion on major road corridors.

Commercial figures across other city flyovers highlight the revenue disparity:

  • Anjali Flyover: Generates ₹10.50 lakh annually from pay-and-parking contracts with zero municipal infrastructure expenditure.
  • Pallav Bridge: Yields ₹8.00 lakh annually through standard parking tenders.
  • AEC Bridge: Brings in ₹4.10 lakh annually without requiring initial capital development outlays.

Despite these proven revenue streams, the push to divert flyover spaces into high-cost sports zones—handed over to private agencies at dirt-cheap rents—has led to widespread calls for an inquiry into the decision-making process within the municipal administration.